Here’s the full picture from the four traceroutes.
Hop counts (TTL depth, intermediary routers)
| Route | Total hops | Intermediary routers |
| nbg1 → nyc1 | 14 | ~12 |
| nyc1 → nbg1 | 17 | ~15 |
| nbg1 → us-west-1 | 28 | ~26 |
| us-west-1 → nbg1 | 15 | ~13 |
Average across all four directions: ~16 intermediary routers, but with very large asymmetry.
EU ↔ US East (NYC) — ~40–45 ms
Nuremberg → NYC uses Core-Backbone (AS33891) — a very direct 14-hop path:
Hetzner NBG β core-backbone.com nbg40
β ae7-2093.nyk10.core-backbone.com
β DigitalOcean NYC NYC → Nuremberg uses NTT (AS2914) — 17 hops, routing via London or Paris before Frankfurt:
DigitalOcean NYC β NTT Newark
β NTT London/Paris
β NTT Frankfurt
β Hetzner NBG EU ↔ US West — ~82 ms
Nuremberg → us-west-1 uses Telia Carrier (AS1299) — 28 hops, the longest path by far:
Hetzner NBG β Telia Paris β Telia Ashburn (VA)
β Telia Chicago/Atlanta
β Telia LA/Palo Alto
β AWS us-west-1 → Nuremberg uses NTT (AS2914) — only 15 hops:
AWS β NTT San Jose (snjsca04)
β NTT Ashburn (asbnva02)
β NTT Frankfurt (frnkge13)
β Hetzner NBG Key Takeaways
- The asymmetry is entirely driven by ISP peering choices, not physical cable distance.
- The most extreme imbalance: 26 hops outbound vs. 13 hops inbound on the US West path — Telia’s US interior routing is much chattier than NTT’s.
- The NTT path (used by both US probes returning to Europe) consistently routes via London or Paris before Frankfurt, explaining the ~5 ms penalty on the NYC→EU direction vs. EU→NYC.